[HARDWARE] Just a few question :)+>

Drew Lanclos cutriss at null.net
Fri Sep 24 02:53:47 EDT 1999

I was almost positive about this myself, but I'm asking for a
friend...Socket 7 procs aren't pin-compatible (Regardless of chipset
support, mind ye) with Socket 370, right? He wasn't sure...I figured there
was a voltage issue, as well as a difference in pinouts...
Anyone wanna confirm this for me?

Rick -- > You mentioned a quantity of ONE Celeron...that implies you were
thinking about getting a dual-Celery rig going? Just curious...if that were
the case, you'd probably wanna stick with a dual-Slot 1 board and use
slocket adapters...better for the heat, and easily adaptable for dual-slot

Also...I read that Via's planning on producing Cyrix's Cayenne processors,
code-named Joshua on the (My goodness...) Socket 570...Dear god...these
processors are gonna start getting HUGE...pretty soon we'll be going back to
the old backplane design, except the EXPANSION slots, I/O, northbridge and
southbridge controllers, you name it...will be on the riser card, and the
MOBO will be just this REALLY big 13000 pin socket...Aiyeeee!!!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hardware at lists.distributed.net
> [mailto:owner-hardware at lists.distributed.net]On Behalf Of Jonathan Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 10:34 PM
> To: hardware at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: RE: [HARDWARE] Just a few question :)+>
> First off, yes all celerons are multipier locked.  (Except for the early
> engineering samples that some review sites get to play with, however they
> don't count since you can't buy one.)
> So far, dispite rumors to the contrary, no Intel processors
> detect and lock
> in the bus speed.  Every rumor so far seems to have been people
> getting the
> odd cpu that just can't handle being overclocked.
> I don't know of any way to bypass the multipier lock on a
> celeron, but there
> isn't any bus lock, so you can't overclock all you like.
> The easier and safest thing to do if you want a fast overclocked
> celeron is
> spend a bit extra and buy a 366 that is pretested stable at 550.
> On cache, all celerons have 32k of L1 cache, even the old 233,
> 266, and 300s
> that lacked L2 cache.
> Every celeron since the 300A has 128k L2 cache.  That includes every PPGA
> (socket 370) celeron made.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hardware at lists.distributed.net
> [mailto:owner-hardware at lists.distributed.net]On Behalf Of R. Bruch
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 10:13 PM
> To: hardware at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: Re: [HARDWARE] Just a few question :)+>
> I hope people will bear with me on this question, because although it
> isn't directly about rc5 hardware stuff, I think it still could be of
> interest to people who want to build a good rc5 cracking PC.
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Hunter S. wrote:
> > You said (on Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:20:13 +0100) -
> > > *snip* Some questions about building a dual celeron box *snip*
> Then,
> > > I've heard about limitations on overclocking celeron 400 MHz ...
> > > Which to choose ??
> Hunter S. replies:
> > I would get dual Celeron 366 ppga (socket 370). Tested at 550 generally
> cost
> > about $100, and non tested can be had for $60 (I speak of OEMs,
> since they
> are
> > the most likely to overclock, contrary to all previous chips).
> >
> > If you get an untested Celeron 366 ppga, depending on the week,
> you could
> have
> > up to a 95% success rate overclocking to 550Mhz. On the Celeron 400,
> however,
> > the most you are guaranteed of is 450, and ou might, with
> and
> > very nice cards, hit 498.
> Okay, here's my question.  I also am interesting in building a celeron
> powered box, but with just one processor.  I am hoping to overclock it,
> but I have heard about some problems.  The first thing I've heard is that
> Intel has locked the multiplier on the celeron, leaving the only way to
> overclock is by increasing bus speed.  Now I don't have a problem with
> this but then I've also heard that now the celeron detects bus speed and
> will only run on a 66 Mhz bus.  Is this true?  I've also heard there is
> some way of bypassing one or both of these problems, but not been able to
> find any direct answers.  Maybe these problems are only on the
> newer, higher speed celerons?  I have not managed, after a bunch of web
> surfing, to come up with a definitive answer.  So the question is, which
> celerons are the best price/performance, taking into consideration
> overclocking potential?
> Oh, another thing.  I am also looking at the socket 370 variety.  I have
> noticed in price listings a distinction made between, say "400MMX PPGA"
> (which means socket, right?) and "400MMX 128KB".  So does that mean that
> some celerons have the L1 cache and some don't?  I've read that the 128KB
> of L1 cache can go a long way toward making up the difference between the
> celeron and the PII with its larger L2 cache.  So, if possible I'd like to
> get a celeron with the cache.
> > *snip* Helpful hint about cooling *snip*
> > *snip* Helpful hint about IRC #celeron *snip*
> > Hope this helps,
> > Hunter S.
> I appreciate any help given!
> Thanks,
> Rick Bruch
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe hardware' to
> majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe hardware' to
> majordomo at lists.distributed.net

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe hardware' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net

More information about the Hardware mailing list