[HARDWARE] Mac Questions -
dan_oetting at uswest.net
Mon Mar 11 12:46:49 EST 2002
on 3/11/02 9:00 AM, George wrote:
>1. can I pause / stop the program to change monitors (do I really need
You need to at least put the system to sleep if the monitor resolution
changes. Hot swapping monitors is not recomended (although I do it myself
on occasion). There is a slight possibility of damaging the monitor or
computer. Always turn the monitor off first.
Many macs can run headless though a few will not boot without a monitor.
Plugging in a VGA adaptor will fool the mac into thinking a monitor is
attached and define a monitor resolution so you can access the machine
remotly via Timbuktu.
>2. " " " " " " change the mob, add
It's generally recomended.
>3. how often does the Cruncher dial-out? I have 170 days to go on an LC
>III+, 12 MB of Ram.
You can set that in the preferences or disable it and flush the blocks
manualy. Is the 170 days the time before your LCIII gets replaced? Or
does the client say it will take 170 days to process the blocks in the
buffer? If you got a new G4 you could complete all those blocks in part
of an afternoon.
Unless you are going on vacation your buffers should not be larger than a
few days worth of work. There is half a chance that RC5 will be over in
170 days and none of your blocks will be counted.
>4. does a Ram disk speed things up?
A ram disk won't speed things up but if you can enable the energysaver
you won't have to listen to the HD spinning all night.
>5. any advice welcome - what about power failures?
After a power failure the client will restart from the last state saved
on the HD. If you have checkpointing enabled you will only loose up to
one checkpoint interval of work. Otherwise the client saves it's state
after every block so you only loose the current block. If you run a ram
disk you loose the entire buffer.
Compute the cost of the electricity to keep this machine running when the
only thing it's doing is crunching blocks. Divide the electric cost by
the time it takes you to process 1 block to get your cost per block. Now
divide the $10,000 RSA prize by number of blocks remaining in the contest
to get the expected gain per block (currently that's $0.0000005 or 1/20
thousanth of a penny per block). If your computer uses only 5 watts and
it takes an hour to complete a block and electricity is $.10 per kwh your
cost per block is $.10/1000 * 5 /1 or $0.0005. Your costs are 100 times
larger than your expected gains so why do you do it?
If you are running the client to contribute to the global cause let's
look at the global numbers. If we multiply your cost per block by the
total number of blocks processed so far we get $0.0005 * 68.7 trillion =
$34+ million. This is the cost of electricity alone that has already been
burned by the distributed.net clients cracking RC5-64. And we can expect
to burn another 5 million before the key is found. Is it really worth it?
-- Dan O.
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe hardware' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
More information about the Hardware