[PROXYPER] Proxyper for w95 requires winsock2?

wkitty42 wkitty42 at alltel.net
Sat Dec 4 16:12:38 EST 1999


when one's employer has all machines configured with the same versions of
everything, it could be job threatening. several of my clients are like
this. _every_ machine in their stables is identical as far as software
versions... from the OS to the simplest utilities...

----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen M Doherty <stephenm at doherty.net>
To: <proxyper at lists.distributed.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 1999 6:04 AM
Subject: RE: [PROXYPER] Proxyper for w95 requires winsock2?


> What harm could arise from updating winsock?
>
> Stephen M Doherty
> stephenm at doherty.net
> ICQ: 1511902
> http://stephenm.doherty.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-proxyper at lists.distributed.net
> [mailto:owner-proxyper at lists.distributed.net]On Behalf Of ero4 at home.com
> Sent: Saturday, 4 December 1999 6:54 PM
> To: proxyper at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: [PROXYPER] Proxyper for w95 requires winsock2?
>
>
> Proxyper for w95 requires winsock2?  The console log shows an error
> WSANOSUPPORT or something like that.  On my home computer, I was free to
> update my winsock to version 2 which fixed it.  But at work I shouldn't
> do that, where I really would like the proxy to function behind the
> firewall to avoid the sneakernet.  Should I ask the dnet staff to
> consider rebuilding the w95 proxyper or do I have another option that
> will work now?
>
> Why'd they use winsock2 functions anyway.
>
> Thanks for any help.
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to
> majordomo at lists.distributed.net
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to
majordomo at lists.distributed.net
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net



More information about the proxyper mailing list