[PROXYPER] stable build?
davesc at cmi-asi.com
Tue Jun 15 10:41:01 EDT 1999
mmmmm, spanner...Oh, anyway, they are a bit nicer for the bigger machines,
but my main interest is an attempt to cut down on the time it takes to drop
10k blocks across my unenviable connection. Unless I'm mistaken, it seems
to take the same time to flush a 2^28 block as it does a 2^31 block, so the
more bigger blocks I have, I should be able to transfer more work faster...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Ah Kit [SMTP:ahkitj at paradise.net.nz]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 9:04 AM
> To: proxyper at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: Re: [PROXYPER] stable build?
> I must be keeping myself in the wrong circles, but I've been hearing much
> this new block size (right jargon?) without actually knowing much behind
> In short, why larger-than-2^31? Can I throw a spanner in the works and
> that it's for the faster CPUs among us...?
> Jonathan :)
> Jonathan Ah Kit
> ahkitj at paradise.net.nz, ahkit.jonathan at hvhs.ac.nz,
> ahkitj at startrekmail.com,
> ahkitj at poboxes.com, ICQ#9747234
> GeoCities Community Leader, SiliconValley/Park (5000-5499) -
> Hutt Valley High School, New Zealand - http://www.hvhs.ac.nz/
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Schroeder, Dave <davesc at cmi-asi.com>
> To: <proxyper at lists.distributed.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 1999 00:14
> Subject: [PROXYPER] stable build?
> > Is there a stable (pronounced "not broken") build out there for WinNT
> > will handle the new larger than 2^31 blocks but does not auto-determine
> > buffer sizes? I've been running 303 without incident, but it would be
> > to update a bit without breaking anything.
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to
> majordomo at lists.distributed.net
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
More information about the proxyper