[Re: [PROXYPER] Reloading the INI file on NT]
rc5 at xfiles.nildram.co.uk
Fri Mar 19 19:34:18 EST 1999
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999, Dmitri Besedin wrote:
> Why stopping and starting the ProxyPer? Please don't think that there's no
Hello? Even the proxy coder said that there is *no* way to force the INI
reload with the NT *service*. With the services there is no window to
MAKE active. Ctrl-[whatever] works with the normal version, but not when
you run it as a service.
> way to force the INI reload (and server connection simultaneously). Just
> make sure that the Proxy window is active and hit Ctrl-ScrollLock. That's
> what I do *every morning*, since I set the connection mode to offline.
> Ctrl-Break is INCORRECT combination, and it doesn't work.
Actually, I think Ctrl-Break => SIGHUP = Reload ini, and Ctrl-ScrLk =>
SIGALRM = Connect to server. Although, I could be insanely wrong, as I
have never tried.
> However, I'd like to see the concept of signal sending, e.g. in the next
> release of Windows NT (Win2000). I'm sure NT can send the signals. Here's
> the pretty old example: run Quake.exe (from DOS version of iD Software's
> Quake), which is incompatible with WinNT, and see what will happen. It'll
> display something like "Exiting due to signal SIGSERV ... blah blah blah
> If only there were the good KILL command that can send the signals... it'd
> be much easier just to schedule the daily proxyper updates.
Bah, why wait for windoze NT to support it when there are plenty of free,
stable, and *BETTER* OS's out there with full signal support already? I'm
not trying to start a flame war on O/S's, but I just don't understand
people who insist on using Micro$oft O/S's even when they want all the
features from a *NIX operating system.. sheesh..
-- If you want *NIX use *NIX!
E-Mail: dtaylor at nildram.co.uk.spam
[Remove .spam from e-mail to reply]
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
More information about the proxyper