andreas.beckmann at student.uni-halle.de
Sun Mar 26 23:16:27 EST 2000
From: Mike Morrow <mike at micratek.com>
To: proxyper at lists.distributed.net <proxyper at lists.distributed.net>
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [PROXYPER] Win9x
>That's not it, either. I set:
>and it still does not send in.
Set all thresholds > 1. The client might use a default value if = 1,
set flush < fetch (otherwise it ignores the flush value).
Do not use time thresholds.
>I think I overlayed whatever I had with this new one. I hope a new release
>comes out quickly.
>Does no one even run a short block though this stuff to see if it works
>before release???? I could certainly test Win32/NT4 and Win2K sending to a
>perproxy. That would not be difficult to do and might save others the
>problems. I would only need early access to the proposed release. It
>seems this configuration is not currently being tested much or at all.
>If there is no testing going on, I would expect that lots of folks will
>quickly decide that this is not worth the trouble for, essentially, no reward.
There will be a beta ... hmm ... soon.
CPU time is a terrible thing to waste!
Join the world's fastest computer - http://www.distributed.net - Team #11292
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe proxyper' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
More information about the proxyper