[rc5] Re: Supercomputers & Bovine, Q&A
marcus at dfwmm.net
Mon Aug 4 21:08:13 EDT 1997
Eric P. Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Murray Stokely wrote:
> > It probably would have been easier to point out that his entire
> > argument that RISC is better was pointless especially in this
> > context. CISC machines such as x86's are outperforming RISC machines
> > such as alphas that run at over twice the clockspeed.
> This is nonsense. Please show me an x86 chip that can outrun a 600
> mhz Alpha.
To put it simply, post your keyrates and we'll compare. Meanwhile a dual
PPro200 will turn 960+Kkeys/sec and the two PPros will cost less than
the single Alpha.
Or, I will, as soon as you can show me an Alpha that costs less than
Like my CISC(6x86) CPU does.
If you want to be specific, here's $3000. Show me the fastest system
that that you can buy for that amount. I guarantee that you won't buy
an Alpha based machine.
If price was no object, I still wouldn't buy an Alpha, I'd buy an IBM
NEC, a Cray, or perhaps one of those massively parallel PPro monsters.
Especially if the benchmark was the RC5 cracker.
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5