[rc5] Re: Supercomputers & Bovine, Q&A
gnork at beyond.malmo.lth.se
Tue Aug 5 15:46:31 EDT 1997
On Mon, 4 Aug 1997 bennett_t1 at popmail.firn.edu wrote:
> At 07:53 PM 8/4/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Murray Stokely wrote:
> >> It probably would have been easier to point out that his entire
> >> argument that RISC is better was pointless especially in this
> >> context. CISC machines such as x86's are outperforming RISC machines
> >> such as alphas that run at over twice the clockspeed.
> Wha??? Someone slap this person... Benchmarks show RISC chips of lower
> clock speed outrunning CISC's of higher clock speed. That's basic
> knowledge. Where in the nether hell did you dig this fact up?
*SLAP* *SLAP* We better slap both! *SLAP* *SLAP*
Some SPECint95 numbers taken from Motorola, Digital and Intel.
PowerPC 604 300Mhz: 12.4
Alpha 21164 600Mhz: 18.0
Pentium II 300Mhz : 11.6
PowerPC 750 266Mhz: 12.4
> >This is nonsense. Please show me an x86 chip that can outrun a 600
> >mhz Alpha.
> To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5