[rc5] Stats question

Eric P. Anderson crusader at mo.net
Thu Aug 14 16:52:22 EDT 1997

I agree.  I think that the current contribution is much more important
than the cumulative contribution.  A team with a faster current
contribution has a greater chance of finding the key.  The cumulative
contribution has no effect on a team's chance of finding the key.

On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Joshua Weage wrote:

> 	Nice job on the stats.  Is there any reason behind
> ranking according to total contribution instead of fastest 
> current contribution?  Just wondering why it was done 
> one way and not the other.  Ranking according to 
> current contributions promotes more 'competition'
> and a quick reflection of additional machines.

To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.

More information about the rc5 mailing list