[rc5] Stats question
Eric P. Anderson
crusader at mo.net
Thu Aug 14 16:52:22 EDT 1997
I agree. I think that the current contribution is much more important
than the cumulative contribution. A team with a faster current
contribution has a greater chance of finding the key. The cumulative
contribution has no effect on a team's chance of finding the key.
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Joshua Weage wrote:
> Nice job on the stats. Is there any reason behind
> ranking according to total contribution instead of fastest
> current contribution? Just wondering why it was done
> one way and not the other. Ranking according to
> current contributions promotes more 'competition'
> and a quick reflection of additional machines.
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5