why we don't use another way , WAS Re: [rc5] Next Crack
phoenix at cutey.com
Sun Aug 24 19:17:42 EDT 1997
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 14:34 21/08/97 -0600, Steve Trottier wrote:
I want to know, why we use the brute forte attack to crack the
algorithm, why don't we use another way ?
Actually I've an idea, this come from playing card
Some years ago, I used to play card with my sister , and one of her
game is , I select one card from the whole cards, and remember it.
And after some process , She can know what card it is
Actually I look all the keys like a pile of cards , and only one of
the card is true.
So if now I've know how to implementate it , I would do it.
>I'm not sure why you think that the Bovine effort would be
>RC5-64. In the FAQ, they mention Mersenne Primes and Distributed
>Engine as candidates for the next project but do not mention RC5-64.
>the prime numbers and the chess engine sound interesting. RC5-56 is
>interesting because it is solvable within a year. RC5-64 has 256
>much keyspace and would likely take much much longer to solve than
>I don't know about the others participating in this effort, but I
>unlikely to spin my CPU on a project that I thought was going to
>years to finish.
>strottier at novell.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5