[rc5] Next Crack
rskrueger at jtmd.com
Mon Aug 25 11:25:16 EDT 1997
>> Sigh, Java code is slower than taking the v1 source and compling it on
>> your own machine. In fact, it is 130 times slower, and due to "features"
>> in Java, you would have to have a proxy server on the server you retrieved
>> the url from. It is a nice idea, and it was done, and it was slower than
>> a SE/30. Since the machines that Java has been ported to already have
>> native client, the loss in performance would be tremendous.
>Agreed. I think most people would be put off by the speed penalty of Java.
What a pissy trade-off. The huge step that one source would provide vs.
the slowness of java.
However, the JIT compilers have been coming into fruition. The web site
suggests that JIT compilers can be faster than C++. Of course this will
vary greatly, but it's encouraging. Compiled Java will never be as fast
as assembly, but is in the neighborhood.
Anyway, a Java based client is not impossible and the speed lost by not
going to assembly can be made up by more people running the client.
Another idea: There is a lag in writing the different platform clients,
Java could be the bridge to start a new project on all platforms and then
swap in the native code when it gets done.
-rskrueger at jtmd.com
-James Tower Media Design
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5