[rc5] Re: rc5-digest V1 #44

Rebecca and Rowland rebecca at astrid.u-net.com
Wed Jul 16 03:41:59 EDT 1997

>Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 08:51:21 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Stephen Langasek <vorlon at dodds.net>
>Subject: Re: [rc5] Re: rc5-digest V1 #44
>On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Bryan Golder wrote:
>> That said, everyone who is complaining about client problems here is only
>> doing so because they want things to work right so this team will win
>> (including me!).
>No.  Everyone who is complaining here is doing so because they have all
>the manners and consideration of a two-year-old.  I want the clients to
>work, too, but you don't see me kvetching about it.  Why?  Common courtesy
>for one.

Point: without feedback, the developers can't know about any problems the
clients have.

>And because I understand that people coming onto this list and
>doing a wide-mouthed impression of Sanford Wallace in a technology fair
>do nothing to further this effort.

But how about careful, methodical end users taking the time to fully
investigate an apparent problem to the best of their ability, and sending a
detailled and carefully-considered description of the problem to the
developer - who then doesn't even bother to reply with a `thanks for the
bug report'?

Who has the manners of a two year old?

>entering the corporate world.  So my empathy for those whose social graces
>were inspired by something akin to a warthog... is nonexistent.  Bug
>reports?  Fine.  Suggestions for improvements?  Ideas are always welcome.
>Bitching about how abysmally the client works with your setup?  Save it
>for alt.dev.null.  They're interested in reading it there.  I'm not.

But...  What about people who find that the client *doesn't* work on their
setup, and have 1) No control over the client 2) No documentation to help
them 3) No feedback from the developers - aside from the mis-information
that `The Mac client works fine out of the box - it works fine!' which is a
bit rich given that I have an email from the bloke who developed the v2 Mac
client, in which he states that he didn't test it on a 68K Mac - what other
tests did he miss?  It's clear that the Mac client *doesn't* work fine out
of the box - so what are we to do?  It appears to do something other than
what I thought it should be doing, but what do I know?  The documentation
doesn't explain what it does, nor how to tell if it's doing it.


To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.

More information about the rc5 mailing list