[rc5] MacOS the top? Funny

Mike Silbersack silby at execpc.com
Mon Jul 28 08:09:47 EDT 1997

> On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > Well, yes, MacOS does look like the top team, doesn't it?
> Not really, MacOS is an OS, not a team. The top team seems to be:
> linux at linuxnet.org   1253138   101.5 days   a long time ago   unknown 

I apologize for my terminology, you are correct, I meant OS.

> > Well, guess MacOS isn't the top.  (I don't know who updates
> > rc5.distributed.net, but I'm guessing it's not someone on an x86
> > processor...)
> Which page are you looking at? I didn't see anything that said MacOS was
> the top. http://rc5.distributed.net/stats/total/platform.html is sorted
> the numbers of blocks completed. Not counting the version 1 clients, the
> v2.000 MacOS client running on a PPC has completed more blocks than any
> other OS/CPU/client version. That does not imply that MacOS clients have
> completed more blocks than Win32 clients, or that PPCs have completed
> blocks than x86s. What are you getting so worked up about? 

Either I was hallucinating, or whoever updates the web page saw my post. 
When I went to the main page last night, the What's New for July 28th said:
"The top OS now has a FAQ of its..."  Now it says, "MacOS now has a FAQ of

> And if you look at the stats by OS, you'll see that Win32 is the top OS,
> with MacOS at #2, and if you look at the stats by processor, you'll see
> that x86 is the top processor, with about twice as many blocks as the
> (Once again not counting the v1 clients).
> Calm down.

Sorry, I just don't like the contest organizers to start playing favorites.

> Name: Dave Huang     |   Mammal, mammal / their names are called /

Mike "Silby" Silbersack
silby at execpc.com

Have some CPU cycles to spare?  Visit http://rc5.distributed.net
and join the effort to prove the necessity of strong encryption!

To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.

More information about the rc5 mailing list