[rc5] Various results, various CPUs

Saari Anssi as at cs.tut.fi
Mon Jul 28 17:19:07 EDT 1997

> Not completely, but this means that almost all of that 16K is
> available for instruction storage if the data storage
> requirements are light. Which, in the case of the rc5 code,
> they are. There is also a primary, instructions only, cache of
> 256 bytes. Since the new mmx procs from intel have split 16k
> code/16k data caches, that might just be the difference 

Almost 16K plus 256B is better than definitely 16K? Well, depends on the
almost, I guess :)

I'd really like to know if the most timecconsuming code fits in the 8K
cache of a regular Pentium and what is really the operation(s) that uses
up the most time. I seem to recall reading once that the rotate
instructions are rather slow in a Pentium, perhaps this could be the
reason for the advantage of other processors over the Pentium?


To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.

More information about the rc5 mailing list