[rc5] keyspace flaw
jlawson at hmc.edu
Tue Jun 3 12:53:33 EDT 1997
At 12:44 PM 6/3/97 -0600, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 03, 1997 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Benedikt Eric Heinen wrote:
>>which would indicate that 5.03% of all possible blocks weren given out -
>>1.77% reported back, 3.26% didn't. That leaves enough distance between 0
>That's pretty amazing! I'm real curious if those numbers are correct.
>It would seem to indicate that for every keyblock that's done there are
>nearly two that are checked out and not returned. Does this indicate
>that people are picking up the clients, running them for 15 minutes and
>getting bored and stopping? Perhaps a smaller key-block size would
>increase production by up to 200%?
No, they're not correct and I don't know why people keep assuming that
we're strictly going in order starting from zero. We've picked up and
moved around a couple of times already and have played with random
distribution at times.
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5