[rc5] SOURCE CODE AND REQUESTS FOR OTHER PLATFORMS
davids at cosmic.swau.edu
Sun Jun 22 01:33:55 EDT 1997
On Sun, 22 Jun 1997, Seth D. Schoen wrote:
> > if someone is willing to put up a v1-to-v2 proxy/convertor
> My bottom-line conclusion: either the v1 protocol should not be expired,
> or developers should not be permitted to develop the proxy converter
> which is being discussed. Sorry to anybody who is planning to use it... :-)
> Can anybody clarify specifically the reasoning behind making the old
> clients stop working eventually? I joined the list late (after
> DESCHALL) and might have missed it.
I will admit that I presented my idea while ignoring the reasons for the
discontinuing the v1 clients. It was presented in the spirit of "maybe
there's a way to satisfy "source required" organizations without releasing the
source to the v2 clients". Cryptographically signing the binaries is a good
idea, though I don't know how acceptable that will be to the "source
required" organizations. I've seen the source to the v2 clients while
working on the VMS port and I haven't seen anything malicious so far...
(For the organizers to code in something malicious would again be a stupid,
David R. Sowder sowderd at swau.edu davids at hpnc.com
Assistant Director of Information Services Chief Network Engineer
Southwestern Adventist University Hypernet Communications Inc.
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.
More information about the rc5