[RC5] Technically, he's not "Holding blocks hostage"

Daniel Baker dbaker at wrangler.cuckoo.com
Tue Nov 18 16:37:38 EST 1997


> At 08:49 AM 11/18/97 +0000, Adam Clark wrote:
> 
>   Technically, is he REALLY holding blocks 'hostage'?  After all, there are
> going to be blocks on machines out there that never get sent back to a
> proxy and MAY have the key in them....if this is the case (so I was told in
> #rc5) then the blocks that were never returned will be sent back out at the
> end when all of the other blocks are completed and the server realizes
> which blocks it never received back.
> 
> Can someone 'in the know' verify this? 

Yup, you're 100% correct.

This guy is a complete and total idiot.

Daniel

> 
> Thanks,
>  Matt Coleman
>  Nashville, Tennessee
> 
> >All this, and you have the utter lack of WIT to suggest that you're 
> >going to hold blocks HOSTAGE?  You're a funny, disturbed individual.  
> >Go take your "thousands" of blocks and go play somewhere else.  I 
> >truely do hope you get blocked from the proxy servers, as this effort 
> >is far better off without the likes of you around.
> >
> >-Adam Clark
> >
> 
> --
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       USER   PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ   RSS  TT STAT  START  TIME   COMMAND
>   maverick  4022 99.9  1.4   592   212  ?  R N   08:04  12:06  rc564
>    
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>   maverick at ninja.techwood.org --------- http://www.martek.net/maverick
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> To unsubcribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at llamas.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
> 


-- 
Daniel Baker (dbaker at cuckoo.com)
Chief Technology and Executive Officer -- CuckooNet! (http://www.cuckoo.com)
--
To unsubcribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at llamas.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list