[RC5] My head is going to explode...
bofh at codenet.net
Tue Nov 18 19:05:18 EST 1997
Actually, it's completely logical. By reviewing the source code for a program you
are going to be running and then compiling it yourself, you eliminate the possibility
of a Trojan causing havoc on your system.
It's not at all common in the Windows world, but Unix people have been doing
it for decades.
Ian Samuel (bofh2 at devcom.net) - Proud Founder of TTM
Elite hax0r and Nomadic Mortician
"With this word of power, I cast thy soul into the void: void(soul)"
From: Daniel Baker <dbaker at wrangler.cuckoo.com>
To: rc5 at llamas.net <rc5 at llamas.net>
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [RC5] My head is going to explode...
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Greg Apessos wrote:
>> > On a stupider note, are you guys morons? I don't wish to often any
>> > of you non-moron people out there cause i know that's a majority of you but
>> > how the heck is the source code exactly going to help you if someone somehow
>> > sneaked a trojan client onto the FTP site. You would still have the code
>> > for the correct client but the one you downloaded would be the hacked
>> > version which is bent on computer domination!?!? Tell me i'm missing
>> > something cause the problem looks really simple to me, there is none!!
>> ...because with the source, we would be compiling our OWN clients WITH
>> that source, instead of downloading a precompiled binary?
>Oh, that's VERY logical. I agree with you 100%..... BTW, can you send me
>the source to netscape again? I seem to have misplaced my copy.
>Daniel Baker (dbaker at cuckoo.com)
>Chief Technology and Executive Officer -- CuckooNet! (http://www.cuckoo.com)
>To unsubcribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at llamas.net
>rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
To unsubcribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at llamas.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5