[rc5] Blocks

dan carter daniel.carter at stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Thu Oct 9 19:12:39 EDT 1997

On 08 Oct 1997 20:30:11 -0700, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:

>Dan Ports <danz at lanminds.com> writes:

>> likely still be found. However, if blocks are requested and returned as
>> checked, and one happens to be the block containing the correct key (as
>Which is trivial to make happen with just a bit of assembler
>hacking.  A bit more and it doesn't even have to bother checking
>the key.  I don't need to know the protocol to make the client
>lie to the server.
>That's why this "no source code" thing is so stupid.  If the
>source code were released, the dozens of simple requests that
>people have made would be done in a matter of days.  It's stupid,
>stupid, stupid, stupid.
However the number of people who find assembler hacking a trivial task
is a far far smaller number, than the number of people who find making
a change in C code trivial.

Thus not releasing source code, greatly reduces the number of people
able to spam the servers.
|                  daniel carter                  |
|               phone +64 3 4736986               |
|        daniel.carter at stonebow.otago.ac.nz       |
|       1 crown st, dunedin, new zealand ;-}      |

To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo at llamas.net with 'unsubscribe rc5' in the body.

More information about the rc5 mailing list