[RC5] Possibly reporting unchecked blocks as done

BARNETTE JEFFREY D JEFFBARN at LPFPO.kelly.af.mil
Wed Jan 21 12:54:53 EST 1998


Perhaps the clients could be modified to tell us what type of block is 
being
sent or retrieved?

i.e. [01/20/98 15:46:06 GMT] Sent 8 DES block(s) to server

Jeff

> ----------
> From: 	Joe Zbiciak[SMTP:j-zbiciak1 at ti.com]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, January 21, 1998 1:12 AM
> To: 	rc5 at llamas.net
> Subject: 	Re: [RC5] Possibly reporting unchecked blocks as done 
> 
> 'Ray Vanlandingham' said previously:
> 
[snip]

> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >[01/20/98 15:46:06 GMT] Sent 8 block(s) to server
> | >
> 
[snip]

> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> | >[01/20/98 15:46:25 GMT] Sent 40 block(s) to server
> | 
> 
[snip]

> This may be a bit of confusion in the messages.  If you had any RC5 blocks
> buffered up, those would have been sitting around flushed (since you
> weren't
> up to your flushing threshold yet) in the first round of flushing.  From
> what I've observed, the client goes through all the motions for RC5 first,
> DES second, whenever you request -fetch, -flush, -update, whatever.

--
To unsubcribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list