[RC5] We need strong international encryption!
wnissen at resumix.com
Mon Jul 20 11:20:48 EDT 1998
We also have to remember that d.net is growing at a rate which will
outstrip most other efforts. If we really are going to be 2.6 times
faster when each new DES contest starts, EFF will have to spend a lot of
money to beat that growth rate, seeing as they only grow linearly. Of
course, they have the advantage of 100% "participation," but we have
exponentiation on our side. EFF quoted US$50,000 to build another DES
cracker system, now that the research has been done, but imagine how
much general-purpose idle time that would buy if it were turned into ads
Walter_Nissen at hmc dot edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary Conner [SMTP:trif at serv.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 1998 1:31 AM
> To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: Re: [RC5] We need strong international encryption!
> On Sun, 19 Jul 1998, Ed McCrudden wrote:
> > What's stopping them from developing similar hardware for RC5?
> Seems to
> > me they have very deep pockets if they can afford to spend a quarter
> > a million dollars to win $10,000.
> Because rc5 is not susceptible to the same kind of attack that makes
> a specialized hardware cracker so deadly to DES. DES has the property
> that given a sufficient population of registers, you can crack many
> keys simultaneously. With 32-bit wide registers you can crack 32
> keys all together with a little bit more work than it would take to
> crack one. DES is a static algorithm, the same steps are applied
> no matter what. RC5 is not, the operations performed on the data
> are dependant on the value of the data.
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to
> majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5