[RC5] My impatient cohorts
William Scott Lockwood III
wsl3 at home.com
Sun Mar 15 22:32:05 EST 1998
Joe Zbiciak wrote:
> Isn't that what NT is supposed to be?
> (Answer: In some ways yes, but in most of the important ways, no.)
Translation: In ALL the important ways, no.
> BTW, has anyone heard anything on the vulnerability of OS/2's TCP/IP
> stack to these varied attacks? I see Win95, *BSD, Linux, Solaris, and
> even routers mentioned all the time, but I can't remember the last time
> I've seen OS/2 mentioned. Is it because OS/2's TCP/IP is really solid,
> or is it because nobody has cared to try these attacks against it?
I'd say that's mainly due to the fact that so few of us use OS/2. I ran it
from 2.1 to Warp 3. I can't anylonger, because tools I need are not available
for it. There out there for 95, and for Linux, but not for OS/2. So, finally
I had to change os's. I hate it, but it is so.
mailto:wsl3 at home.com ICQ: 9554946 http://22.214.171.124/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2794 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.distributed.net/pipermail/rc5/attachments/19980315/8a3e2218/smime-0001.bin
More information about the rc5