One dollar (was [RC5] What If?)

gindrup at gindrup at
Tue Mar 17 18:45:10 EST 1998

     Well, one *could* say "quid", which in the deep recesses of history 
     menat (roughly) one standard unit of the local currency.  
     Unfortunately  :), the inhabitants of the British Isles during the 
     Roman occupation picked up this usage and haven't dropped it.  Thus, 
     in modern (English) usage, a quid appears to be a British Pound.  Of 
     course, the etymology of the word would indicate broader 
     applicability, it doesn't appear to be so.
     And, as far as it goes, US$1 is a particular amount of money (thank 
     the Phoenicians for that one).  Regardless of the fact that you 
     personally may not use that unit, international trade has a way of 
     allowing different currencies to be compared with some precision at 
     a given instant (except for countries with such small monetary bases 
     that the printing of their mints obviously devalues their currency 
     (I always thought of Andorra when thinking this, but it's probably 
     not valid in this case... (Anyway))).  Thus, unless there are 
     significant barriers in trade between any country, state, holding, 
     protectorate, or whatnot and the United States, its states, 
     holdings, or protectorates, this amount of currency is convertible 
     to another amount of currency more local to you.
     I, an American, could just as easily talk about everyone submitting 
     2000 Italian Lira.  This would not indicate that I have a 
     particularly Italian bias, merely that I chose that monetary system 
     in which to designate a certain amount of currency.  Similarly, I 
     could use metric or "English" measurements.  In metric, I could use 
     MKS or CGS.  None of these would predicate a particular bias, 
     *unless* the choice of measurement system resultsed in greater 
     representational or computational difficulty.
     If we are talking about an amount of currency that is equivalent to 
     US$1, then I find no reason to use some other measurement system to 
     represent that rather compact and directly understandable amount.
            -- Eric Gindrup ! gindrup at
                CIS delenda est!

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: One dollar (was [RC5] What If?) 
Author:  <rc5 at> at SMTP
Date:    3/17/98 8:20 AM

>>I live in Canada.  Two hours, round-trip, away from the nearest bank and 
>>post office.  For me to send in $1 U.S., if you can even buy 
>>denominations of US currency that small, is a fairly significant 
>>undertaking for me.
>There is a lot of US money floating around in the Canadian economy. 
>Just ask one of your friends or someone at a business for a US one 
>dollar bill if you need one.
It seems to me somehow, that the most of you guys think, there's noone 
outside the north-american hemisphere contributing to As far as I can 
see on the stats pages, there are some other countries involved too, or is 
it like the *American-dollar* is the new world currency.
Personally I would prefer to rely on a somewhat less turbulent economy than 
the United States. Not that it matters to me, though, because I think the 
idea of a paied contest isn't truly in the spirit of, and I 
for sure wouldn't participate.
>"Great spirits often meet violent opposition 
> from mediocre minds"    -- Albert Einstein
Lars Svane Kreissl Kristensen
Hamletsgade 14 a, 4tv        
2200 Kobenhavn N
tlf: 3585 6347
email:lakr at 
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at 
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list