[RC5] Dupes

Jim C. Nasby nasby at enteract.com
Wed May 13 20:21:44 EDT 1998


Hmmm... you might be right about the 40% Brice, but I'm certain that the dupe
count was much more than 1%. Perhapse Daa or AldE could shed some light...? :)

Moo!
dB!

Brice D. Fleckenstein wrote:

> > > The last time Daa posted stats on our dupe rate, I believe that
> > > something like 40% of the blocks returned were dupes, mostly from old 2.64
> > > clients.
> >
> > Yeah, I still haven't figured that one out. Why would old
> > clients preferentially be producing dupes?
>
>  It is an error in reading the stats - the 40% figure was actually
> "appx. 40% of all dupes are from 2.640x clients" - NOT "40% of the
> blocks produced by such clients are dupes".
>
>  From what I remember of the actual total stats, well under 1% of all
> blocks were dupes on that day.
>
> --
>  My alt.callahans news server is up and running at 208.134.79.21
>
>  "It takes as much courage to try and fail, as it does to try and
> succeed." - Anne Lindburg
>  My opinions are my own, and no others. Please email me copies of any
> replies.
>
>  Reply-to has been de-spammed. Real email address below.
>
>  Brice D. Fleckenstein
>  EMail: bricef at indy dot net
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



--
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!)                                  /^\
nasbjim at charlie.cns.iit.edu                                 /___\
Freelance lighting designer and database developer         /  |  \
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America   /___|___\

Give your computer some brain-candy! http://www.distributed.net Team #1828

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list