Jim C. Nasby
nasby at enteract.com
Wed May 13 20:21:44 EDT 1998
Hmmm... you might be right about the 40% Brice, but I'm certain that the dupe
count was much more than 1%. Perhapse Daa or AldE could shed some light...? :)
Brice D. Fleckenstein wrote:
> > > The last time Daa posted stats on our dupe rate, I believe that
> > > something like 40% of the blocks returned were dupes, mostly from old 2.64
> > > clients.
> > Yeah, I still haven't figured that one out. Why would old
> > clients preferentially be producing dupes?
> It is an error in reading the stats - the 40% figure was actually
> "appx. 40% of all dupes are from 2.640x clients" - NOT "40% of the
> blocks produced by such clients are dupes".
> From what I remember of the actual total stats, well under 1% of all
> blocks were dupes on that day.
> My alt.callahans news server is up and running at 18.104.22.168
> "It takes as much courage to try and fail, as it does to try and
> succeed." - Anne Lindburg
> My opinions are my own, and no others. Please email me copies of any
> Reply-to has been de-spammed. Real email address below.
> Brice D. Fleckenstein
> EMail: bricef at indy dot net
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) /^\
nasbjim at charlie.cns.iit.edu /___\
Freelance lighting designer and database developer / | \
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America /___|___\
Give your computer some brain-candy! http://www.distributed.net Team #1828
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5