[RC5] Which sub-keyspace comes next
sbird at UATC.com
Tue May 26 10:56:20 EDT 1998
From: David Taylor [SMTP:David_Taylor at msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 1998 4:58 PM
To: rc5 at llamas.net
Subject: RE: [RC5] Which sub-keyspace comes next
> Don't you guys think that cracking encryption codes just for
the sake of
> cracking encryption codes is kind of pointless. Not that I
> we're going to break RC5-64 anytime soon or anything,
Yup....... But we are doing this to attempt to show the US
we need more than the 40 bit encryption they are limiting
And is there any point what so ever in finding a big prime
RC5-56 beat the 56 bit contest ages ago. My main gripe is
this...prime numbers or optimal golomb rulers,or what not are at least
mysteries that are undiscovered that are not man-made. If we just sit
and work on RC5-64...then 72,etc.. we're defeating man-made puzzles.
The puzzles have been created for one purpose...so that it takes a long
time to break it. At least with some of the other distributed projects
out there(or projects that COULD be distributed(ie...the chess engine).
There is some tangible goal. At least someone's name will actually be
remembered for finding a number with unique properties.
Now the DES II-2 project I definitely see a point in. Why??
Because it probably wont take more than a couple weeks to beat and the
prize money/time spent ratio will be well worth it.
Couldn't there be some way to come up with a faster way to
break the RC contests?
Hopefully, the V3 clients that handle Mersennes will be done by
the time DES II is completed or maybe SETI at home will be running
But I still don't see any point in finding higher and higher
that was just an example..there are dozens of projects out there
with real-world applications that could be distributed...
check out http://www.mersenne.org/
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5