[RC5] film rendering
Scott I. Remick
scott at computeralt.com
Fri Jan 22 13:21:08 EST 1999
At 06:14 AM 1/22/1999 , you wrote:
>However, rendering _does_ require more network bandwidth than plain ol'
>calculations like OGR or RC5 - you have to dl the 3D model, and then
>upload the finished BIIIIIIG (40Mb+ for 32mm) pictures. Plus of course
>you'd need LOTS more memory and hard disk space. Modem users need not
What if it wasn't done in whole frames per user, but bunches of pixels?
You would fetch the 3D model only once per frame, and then the
"pixelserver" would give you a range of pixels to crunch out. Multiple
people could all be working on the same frame at once. You'd only download
a new model once your frame was finished.
Users could pick the # of pixels in a batch depending on their computer
speed and internet connection.
One could also come up with a way to not have to transfer the entire 3D
model again for each frame. If it were just made up of objects, you'd
download the whole object library first, then for each frame you'd just
need layout data for those objects. Or maybe a diff method where all you
download is how the objects in this frame have changed since the previous.
This would mean sequencial progression through the frames but that's fine.
And if you fall behind and the next frame is 3 ahead, then you download the
3 diffs and now you're on the proper frame.
Just some thoughts...
Scott I. Remick mailto:scott at computeralt.com
Network and Information Systems (802)388-7545 FAX:(802)388-3697
Computer Alternatives, Inc. http://www.computeralt.com
----------> http://www.unix-vs-nt.org/ <-----------
"Voici mon secret. Il est tres simple: on ne voit bien qu'avec le coeur.
L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux."
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5