[RC5] OGR anyone?
Charlz at lvcablemodem.com
Fri Jan 22 12:26:09 EST 1999
Well... seems I got a bit of a sub-thread going
As far as rendering a 3d movie with D.net .... I said it would be the
coolest damn thing we could do... not the easiest :>
And certainly not for every machine that participates in D.net
I noticed though that a lot of people started throwing out names like
Pixar and ILM.... yes they would have a problem with how the movie would
be dispersed and rendered.. but then again they don't need to use
something like D.net cause they have plenty of resources and $$.
But what about a smaller company that doesn't have those resources? And
it wouldn't even have to be feature length.. a 'short' that showed at
like Cannes (sp?) or where ever would be just as cool! ( and doing this
without getting paid would take care of some/most of the legal
implications that Jim lists below)
Of course no one even commented on the main point of my original post
which was that D.net should be going after attainable goals to keep the
name out there. I originally started donating time to the GIMPS effort
based on I believe it was a segment on C|Net television show/channel
..... then I switched over to D.net after seeing a news article that was
released after the DES-II (?) contest that they won. I liked the 'set it
and forget it' aspect of the client. So lets get those headlines and
make D.net a household name!! :)
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> This is starting to sound like the 'distributed stats' argument again, so I'll
> nip it in the bud.
> Databases, by definition, mean dealing with huge amounts of data. They also
> often contain very small computational requirements (although this is not always
> the case). This means that the bottleneck for database operations usually isn't
> CPU horsepower, but disk bandwidth. This means that distributed.net would be
> ill suited to help.
> 3D modeling and raytracing are computationally intense activities. So, while
> there is a huge amount of data involved in a movie like 'A Bugs Life', there
> is also a huge amount of computer horsepower needed for rendering. So, it is
> technically possible that distributed.net would be a useful tool for mass 3D
> rendering projects.
> Whether we could work with the likes of Pixar or DreamWorks is an entirely
> different issue, one of our tax status. distributed.net is a non-profit
> corporation, and I'm not sure that we could sell our services. Plus, I
> imagine that if we could sell our services, many users would find it
> objectionable. I think that many users would also object if we provided free
> service to a commercial project, such as a feature film.
> There's also the minor problem that our current network protocol would be
> woefully inadequate for such a task. }:8)
> On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 01:11:38PM -0500, Ed Wensell III aka THE StormRaiser wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:53:19 -0800 Charles Franks
> > <Charlz at lvcablemodem.com> wrote:
> > > Of course the coolest damn thing we could do would be to render a 3D
> > > movie like 'Antz' or 'A Bugs Life' distributedly (is that a word?) and
> > > have D.net plastered all over theater screens around the world :P
> > Long ago, I had suggested that d.net offer it's services to companies that
> > have massive databases that need converting to Y2K (sure, there are
> > software fixes, but the data fields still need updating). Could be a money
> > maker.
> > However, d.net is a "low bandwidth" project. Data chunks, movie frames,
> > etc would require extra bandwidth. Or at least that's my understanding...
> > Maybe some of the old distributed processing projects (the ones that
> > competed in the first DES contest, but are long since dead) could be
> > revived with something like that...
> > Personally, I think the mailing list takes up more bandwidth than a 1 meg
> > chunk of database info would take... :)
> > Until Soon...
> > Ed Wensell III
> > Systems and Operations Support, Pellissippi State
> > http://www.pstcc.cc.tn.us/departments/sos/
> > Having trouble reading a web page written in a foreign language?
> > Try http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> > rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5