[RC5] Windows 2000 is faster than Windows 98 by about 10%

Patrick Pike pikey2 at xtra.co.nz
Mon Jul 19 22:10:31 EDT 1999


I found that a 133 pentium was a bit to slow for 98!  Let alone 2000.

But I was stating that 2000 on my machine is getting a better keyrate.

----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Granrot <granrot at hem1.passagen.se>
To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 1999 11:59 PM
Subject: RE: [RC5] Windows 2000 is faster than Windows 98 by about 10%


> > Windows 2000 (beta3) is faster than Windows 98 by about 10%
> >
> > Just thought I would put that in to see what pops up.
> >
> > Anyone else notice?
>
> Must be on faster copmuters. My friend ran W2k beta 3 on an old Pentium
133
> with 64 MB RAM. He said it was so slow it was totally unuseful. Running
W98
> on that computer works much bether.
>
> /Martin Granrot
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list