[RC5] Windows 2000 is faster than Windows 98 by about 10%
pikey2 at xtra.co.nz
Mon Jul 19 22:10:31 EDT 1999
I found that a 133 pentium was a bit to slow for 98! Let alone 2000.
But I was stating that 2000 on my machine is getting a better keyrate.
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Granrot <granrot at hem1.passagen.se>
To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 1999 11:59 PM
Subject: RE: [RC5] Windows 2000 is faster than Windows 98 by about 10%
> > Windows 2000 (beta3) is faster than Windows 98 by about 10%
> > Just thought I would put that in to see what pops up.
> > Anyone else notice?
> Must be on faster copmuters. My friend ran W2k beta 3 on an old Pentium
> with 64 MB RAM. He said it was so slow it was totally unuseful. Running
> on that computer works much bether.
> /Martin Granrot
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5