[RC5] New distributed computing idea

Dan Waldron wald7330 at mach1.wlu.ca
Mon Nov 15 17:11:33 EST 1999

Automating this would defeat the entire purpose of writing letters:  to
demonstrate that people are aware of the human rights injustices and
willing to make the effort to protest them.  There is no point in sending
letters unless we are willing to make the effort to become familiar, even
in a very minimal way, with the case involved.  A letter automatically
sent by a computer without human interaction means nothing, and would
actually hurt the international letter-writing campaigns by casting doubt
on their validity.

Dan Waldron

> Hey everybody...  I request simply that you ask yourself one question:
>                            Could we do this?
> 	I believe I have found one of the largest and oldest distributed
> goals.  It's nothing mathematical and has nothing to do with encryption.
> It's human rights.  Since the dawn of politics, people have gotten together
> as a group to protest human rights.  That is much similar to what we are
> doing in RC5-64, we are uniting as a group to solve a common goal.
> 	This all occurred to me today, when an acquaintance of mine was
> writing letters for Amnesty International, a group to which he belongs.  In
> Canada, Amnesty members receive a newsletter on a monthly (or so) basis.
> The newsletter details a few cases of human rights injustice, and who
> (usually politicians) you can send letters/faxes/emails to.  My Father has
> a basic template he uses for his letters, and just changes the names,
> topics, etc..  He then faxes the letters from his he computer, or mails
> them if no fax exists.  He usually refrains from email because A) He
> believes email can be "too easily deleted" and B) email really isn't his
> thing.
> 	This whole thing works well, and has actually changed many minds
> for the better.
> 	It works, and some would say that if something works, don't try to
> fix it.  But I asked myself: isn't there a better way?  Couldn't this be
> automated?  I believe there is.
> 	Imagine a user downloading a client program, like any other
> distributed computing application, but this is much different.  It checks a
> server, which lists cases of human rights injustices, along with the proper
> addresses/fax numbers/emails.  You either type your own letter, or let the
> computer make one for you out of a template, just changing names, return
> addresses, topics, etc..  Then the client either emails (via the net),
> faxes (via a fax modem), or prints it off for mailing.  Best of all, it
> doesn't matter if you have a lowly 486, because it wouldn't matter if you
> could do 300k K/s.
> 	I realize this is a pretty "out on a limb" idea, and is nothing
> like any other distributed computing application.  Think about this for a
> second: what is more beneficial to the human race, ending human rights
> violations, or finding some prime number or golomb ruler?  Really, how does
> finding better encryption help the world?  Better encryption helps us hide
> things from each other better.  Is this what we want?  Also, a project like
> this could never end, until the world broke down it's financial, political,
> and religious boundaries to unite for the common good of mankind.
> A project as described would require the following:
> -Co-operation from a human rights group (which shouldn't be hard to find)
> -A Server (d.net?)
> -Web space (not a problem, d.net maybe?)
> -Programmers
> -A stats server? (It could track the number of letters/faxes/emails or
> something)
> 	To d.net:  imagine the publicity.  SETI at home had lots of publicity,
> and it's at over 1M users.  RC5 is at approx. 200k users.
> 	We can calculate primes, golomb rulers and crack encryption 'til we
> turn blue, but can we really help people?
> Greg Andrews
> distributed computing visionary and
> volunteer for the job of project coordinator (?)
> duck1 at ecn.ab.ca
> ICQ 32517996
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list