[RC5] CSC stats missing blocks

Jim C. Nasby jim at nasby.net
Fri Jan 14 14:42:54 EST 2000


Yes, it would probably be a good idea not to supply offline machines with
any more CSC blocks/buffers. We recycled again this morning, and should need
to recycle again tommorow afternoon sometime.

On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 10:42:16AM +0100, Knut Pfefferkorn wrote:
> On 13 Jan 00, at 1:42, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> 
> > We recycled a couple times in the past few days. As you know, every time
> > we recycle, the odds of turning in work that's been duplicated by
> > someone else goes up, so that is why your (and many other people's)
> > stats have been low recently.
>  
> Does this mean, it makes no sense any longer, run CSC on offline 
> computers which connect only once a day or less?
> 
> 
> 
> greetings,
>     knut
> 
> --
> join our RC5 cracking team  | To ensure privacy and data integrity this message
> http://www.keywarrior.net/  | has been encrypted by using dual rounds of ROT-13
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
> 

-- 
Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!)                                  /^\
jim at nasby.net                                               /___\
Freelance lighting designer and database developer         /  |  \
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America   /___|___\

Give your computer some brain-candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Get paid to surf!! http://www.enteract.com/~nasby/alladvantage.html

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list