[RC5] Getting the maximum performance out of a single processor
repton at repton.org
Sun Jun 25 21:42:50 EDT 2000
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Peter Cordes wrote:
> Two disks would be lame. If you leave out most of the tools, and use ash
> for a shell, you would have plenty of space, esp if you use a compressed
> ramdisk image. (of course, if the computer is really old this might not be
> so good...)
> If you run out of space, use a 1.0 kernel or something. They're smaller.
Its actually not all that hard to fit everything onto one floppy. I did
this whilst at Uni. The floppy had on it a 2.0.3x kernel, a few libs, a
dhcp client, the rc5des client, bash1, and telnet. This meant we could
boot the dos/win3.11 (ugh) machines into linux and then telnet to a
"proper" (i.e. one with more disk space than a floppy) linux box from
where we could do whatever else we wanted to do.
If I remember right, I just started with a minimal set of files and kept
copying things from my Slackware 3.x based box until it worked. All the
stuff in /etc/rc.d was tweaked to not run anything we didn't need. The
ramdisk image had to be compressed to make it fit (after all, the kernel
was ~350k, bash 1.14.7 on my current box is 300k, and the rc5des client is
over ~600k. That doesn't leave anywhere near enough space for all the
other stuff you need.
If anyone is interested, I'll have a dig around and try to find the floppy
image. It must be around somewhere...
Paul Everett Microsoft is not the answer.
repton at repton dot org Microsoft is the question.
http://www.repton.org "No" is the answer.
"God, root, what is the difference?" - Pitr, www.userfriendly.org
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5