[RC5] Linux OGR code not optimized?
David.Pyke at CIBC.com
Wed Sep 20 10:30:41 EDT 2000
Jeff Lawson [jlawson at bovine.net] said:
> The difference is because the OGR core is in portable C and not purely
> assembly, which means it is subject to the efficiency of the optimizer
> within the compiler being used. The Visual C++ and Watcom win32 compilers
> truthfully have a much better x86 optimizer than gcc generally does.
> (The win32 client we release is generally compiled with Watcom.)
Could we find out what flags you use with gcc? Maybe we could suggest
alternates. I hate to see the Win32 platform be better at anything than
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5