[RC5] Computational Power, Linux VS WinNT4 & P-II VS P-III
Ferry van Steen
fvansteen at basix.org
Thu Jan 25 10:08:08 EST 2001
I got a question, which answer is pretty important to me. I'll attach logs
to clearify it.
We've got a local area network here on which I installed a keyproxy
(172.16.1.14) I'll ask you ppl to take a look at 5 computers. All other IP
addresses are not important since they do update slowly but it are only
P166's and they take a long long long time to crack OGR packets.
Anyways the 5 computers I'll be talking about have a fetch setup of
RC5=100,OGR=1 and the sequence is RC5,DES,CSC,OGR
4 of the computers (192.168.0.1-4) are P-II 400's running SuSE 6.4 with
256MB (which should matter much cuz dist client only uses about 1MB
right?) the 5th (172.16.1.104) will be the comparision machine and it has
a P-III 450 with 128 MB running Windows NT4 Workstation.
Ok to come to my question, the P-III (172.16.1.104) updates with the
keyserver 4 times more often than the P-II 400's and I'm wondering where
this huge speed difference is comming from. Does it come forth from the
P-III SIMD which can speed up several calculations by a lot, is the linux
just not as fast as the windows clients and if so how come, or could it be
the linux kernels on the P-II 400's since we're (still) using the standard
kernel that came with the distribution and thus isn't fully cpu/system
Anyone know which of these (if any of these) causes the problem or which
combination of it?
Ferry van Steen
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5