[RC5] Uptime and/or CPU time records?

Enojon enojon at ATTGLOBAL.NET
Thu Jun 7 22:27:21 EDT 2001


So, every 90 days a reboot.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <chicks at chicks.net>
To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:19 PM
Subject: RE: [RC5] Uptime and/or CPU time records?


> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Ryan Malayter wrote:
> > Don't you apply security patches to those Linux boxen?
> 
> Unless it's a kernel update, it doesn't require rebooting.
> 
> -- 
> </chris>
> 
> Any chance of those paper cups and string being upgraded to tin cans
> and wire?  Or as a coworker has said . . . I've seen better throughput
> from a pair of gorillas and flash cards.   -Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list