[RC5] Performance on P-IV
johan at karlb.org
Thu May 10 21:39:17 EDT 2001
SPAAAAM, the wonderful spaaaam! =)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ferry van Steen
To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:31 AM
Subject: [RC5] Performance on P-IV
Hey I've got some sad sad sad statistics. I hope there is an explanation for this because else I have to advise everybody NOT to buy Pentium-IV's because this is sad.....
Ok.. the distributed net does NOT recognize P-IV's yet so it does a micro bench and selects Core #2 RG Class 6 which is the same core running on P-II's. Knowing this you would suspect a performance increase on a P-IV 1400 compared to P-II 400 of 1400/400 = 3.5 which would mean 350% performance increase in MHz so the pure calculative power should increase 350% also... Ding WRONG.
My P-II 400 on Core #2 RG Class 6 Win2K with some services runs 1,128,585,13 according to dnetc -benchmark rc5
The P-IV 1400 (1.4GHz) running -benchmark rc5 Core #2 RG Class 6 only makes a LOUSY 1,824,190,86 on a freshly installed WinME without any services.
This is only a lousy 161.64% (182419086/112858513*100) increase over a 350% increase of MHz's
To give another example
(This runs on linux btw, and the tests I've done the rc5 clients run faster on linux in any case (using the exact same hardware RC5 goes faster under linux than under win)
My AMD Athlon 1000 (1 GHz) scores a friggin' absolutely awesome 3,538,971.00 Hahaha a 1GHz Athlon is almost TWICE as fast as a stinking P-IV 1400 which has 400MHz more under ít's belt. This is scary shit... Hehe Guess I shouldn't buy intel... Atleast not until everything is optimized because this is really sad.
Hope somebody can explain this....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rc5