[RC5] D.net causing overheating

Ryan Malayter rmalayter at bai.org
Thu Nov 15 10:29:34 EST 2001

I actually use dnetc as part of our server burn-in process, too... I'm still
looking for good disk and memory burn-in tools for Win2k if anybody knows of

I'm guessing, though, that dnetc using 100% of the CPU time is more
stressfull to a system with poor cooling than almost any common application
using 100% of the CPU time. My reasoning is that the dnetc cores are
designed to use as much of the CPU's logic as possible all of the time, and
common apps aren't optimized nearly that well. So, more logic used -> more
transistors changing state -> more heat generated.

Still, as you say, any app running the CPU at 100% would probably freeze
this machine.

I think I'm going to swap it out for a different workstation so I can play
with it when I have some free time.

:::Ryan Malayter, MCSE
:::Bank Administration Institute
:::Chicago, Illinois, USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Wilson [mailto:bwilson at distributed.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:27 PM
> To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: RE: [RC5] D.net causing overheating
> Hi, Ryan.
> In general, we've never (to my knowledge) seen a documented 
> case where dnetc itself was the cause of an overheat/crash 
> which would not also have been produced by any other task 
> which consumes all available CPU.
> I have heard that some organizations and even PC vendors use 
> dnetc to burn in their new computers.  If the CPU can hold up 
> under 100% utilization for N days, they decide it's going to 
> last long enough for users.
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list