[RC5] Performance difference Win2k/Win98/ME

TD - Sales International Holland B.V. td at salesint.com
Wed Oct 10 12:11:38 EDT 2001


Shouldn't matter, like I said it was the same system :-) just did format c: 
and installed 98.....

On Tuesday 09 October 2001 19:16, you wrote:
> be sure you have your bios on 'optimum' or 'performance' settings.
> i saw similar behavior on my athlon when the bios was on safe presets.
> course, i do not run 2k, so that could be your problem too.
>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:59:50PM +0200, TD - Sales International Holland
> B.V. wrote: + Hey there,
> +
> + I have no idea what the hell Win2K is upto but it sure sucks! :-)
> + I ran on the same machine Win98/ME they both score around 3,5 mkeys/s on
> + Athlon 1GHz, if I install Win2K on the same machine doing nothing within
> + windows this machine will only crunch a lousy 2.6mkeys/s whilst task
> manager + says that there are NO other processes using CPU time. dnetc has
> 99%. Is this + a client issue or is Win2K secretly stealing CPU cycles
> which can't be seen + in the task manager?
> +
> + Can anyone explain this?
> +
> + Regards
> + --
> + To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> + rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
> +
> --
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list