[RC5] keyrate stabilizing?

Christopher Hicks chicks at chicks.net
Sat Oct 20 14:40:49 EDT 2001

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:

> While rotates are useful in this case, and a few other isolated
> places, this is such an edge case that it's just not worth the silicon
> that it'd take to implement a rotate instruction. Not having one
> simplifies the ALU a bunch, and that speeds up the core and leaves
> more room for other things.  Even if a CPU fakes it, like the newest
> intel and AMD chips likely do, you still get a win. (Heck, if all
> tossing rotate out got you was another line in your L1 cache it'd be
> worth it...)

In this day and age I would think that working well on encryption would be
more of a priority for CPU designers.  It hardly seems like an edge
application to someone that uses ssl and ssh on a daily basis.


Neither sweat, nor blood, nor frustration, or lousy manuals
nor missing parts, or wrong parts shall keep me from my task.

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list