[RC5] keyrate stabilizing?
Zorba the Hutt
zorbathut at uswest.net
Sun Oct 21 03:27:21 EDT 2001
Yeah, but how much CPU does SSL/SSH really take up? I used SSH a little on
my P166, and I didn't exactly have to shut down all my programs. Not only
that, but with the ever-tightening encryption laws, perhaps focusing on
making the (already-fast) encryption even *faster* isn't a good use of their
The people who use CPU power are, for the vast majority, gamers,
programmers, artists, and people who need lots of servers. The only one of
those who cares about rotating bits is the last, and only if they're doing
It just plain isn't worth it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Hicks" <chicks at chicks.net>
To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [RC5] keyrate stabilizing?
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > While rotates are useful in this case, and a few other isolated
> > places, this is such an edge case that it's just not worth the silicon
> > that it'd take to implement a rotate instruction. Not having one
> > simplifies the ALU a bunch, and that speeds up the core and leaves
> > more room for other things. Even if a CPU fakes it, like the newest
> > intel and AMD chips likely do, you still get a win. (Heck, if all
> > tossing rotate out got you was another line in your L1 cache it'd be
> > worth it...)
> In this day and age I would think that working well on encryption would be
> more of a priority for CPU designers. It hardly seems like an edge
> application to someone that uses ssl and ssh on a daily basis.
> Neither sweat, nor blood, nor frustration, or lousy manuals
> nor missing parts, or wrong parts shall keep me from my task.
> To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest
More information about the rc5