[RC5] Blocks missing

Fuzzy Logic fuzzman at m-net.arbornet.org
Thu Apr 11 20:22:43 EDT 2002

Most likely, yes.  At least, that seems like the most reasonable

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
Vir sapit qui pauca loquitur.
Cras amet qui numquam amavit, quique amavit cras plus amet.
Uno itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum.

On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Bjoern Martin wrote:

> Hi there.
> I just wanted to know if any of you have the same problem
> as some of the team I'm on and I do: we are not credited
> for all WUs we submit. It started with one member (he's
> also on this list), then a second one complained about
> missing blocks. I said "maybe its the network between the
> proxy and the master key server". Now, several weeks later,
> I took the time to merge the logs of two proxies I run
> (@home and @work) and found out that I'm affected as well.
> Is this because we recycle blocks and for that more blocks
> are processed randomly by someone else before we can return
> the checked blocks?
> cheers,
> Bjoern Martin

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list