[RC5] new release candidate available.

Tom Ribbens webmaster at multi-air.com
Sun Nov 24 15:43:56 EST 2002

Hash: SHA1

There isn't a cycle lost at my side either, yet i find it boring. Why i find 
it boring? I can't tell exactly. My personal intrests is more in the 
direction of encryption i guess. What i didn't understand is that i heard 
that some clients had some strange errors since they didn't have anything to 
do anymore. All my clients automatically switched to OGR when they realised 
RC5 was finished. How did i do that? In the preference of which projects to 
do first i had RC5 before OGR, and the additional buffer checking was set on 
4. What does that do? It works on a certain project as long as it has work 
for it (or as long work can be fetched) and goes to the next until if it 
can't find anymore work for it. 
So even if i had an internet-outage during RC5-64, my clients could go on for 
at least a week without needing internet (and if internet wasn't fixed in a 
week i would be very mad... ;-)) since i run a perproxy, which contained for 
around 4 days worth of RC5 blocks and some OGR. When i upgrade my perproxy 
and clients for RC5-72, i'll set up the same setup. My priority is RC5, but 
i'd rather do OGR than have any cycle wasted.


Op zondag 24 november 2002 15:32, schreef Timothy Marsh:
> Polls like that will almost always be lead be complainers.  That's because
> most people don't feel moved enough to bother posting a message until they
> are upset about something.  Sure there are the people just asking an
> interesting question when things are going pretty good.  But one thing goes
> wrong and you can see that the vast majority of posts are either complaints
> or responses to complaints.
> I believe dnet is doing the best they can.  I don't think they've lost
> interest in the project, they just don't always have the time to devote to
> dnet that they would like.  As far as wasting cycles, I'm not wasting any.
> I'm happily crunching OGR.  I really don't see why everybody thinks its so
> boring.  Yeah, its a little more complicated to work with as a project, but
> on our (the cruncher) end the only difference is not knowing exactly how
> long a work unit will take.  Understanding OGR takes a little more thinking
> than the basic encryption concept.  And OGR might actually have more
> scientific value than cracking encryption or searching for some massive
> prime number.
> How many people here have even looked at the applications for OGR and why
> exactly do you all think it is so boring.
> Timothy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Hicks" <chicks at chicks.net>
> To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 7:47 AM
> Subject: RE: [RC5] new release candidate available.
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Oliver Otte wrote:
> > > > I agree.  Since d.net is all about not "wasting" CPU cycles, perhaps
> they
> > > > should do a calculation of the number of cycles "wasted" since June
> > > > or whenever that the actual key was found.
> > >
> > > I can't think of anything more useless thing to do. By summing the
> > > wasted CPU cycles up you only get the exact number. What would you do
> > > with that number? Whine about it? Blame d.net for wasting users' money?
> >
> > How about "wallow in negativity"?  Somebody should do a poll.  I would
> > bet that wallowing and whining would lead the pack.  grrr.
> >
> > --
> > </chris>
> >
> > Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
> > fighting against the two most destructive forces in the universe:
> > entropy and human stupidity. They're not things you can always
> > overcome with a "methodology" or on a schedule.
> > -Damian Conway, Perl God
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
> > rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

- -- 
Signs of crime: screaming or cries for help.
		-- The Brown University Security Crime Prevention Pamphlet

 15:37:03  up 13 days, 17:43,  2 users,  load average: 1.55, 1.21, 1.09

Outlook users: please do not put my email address in your address book. This 
way, when you get infected with a virus, my address won't appear in the From: 
header. Thanks.
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)


To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list