[RC5] OGR motivations/achievements in general

dan carter hedonist at win.co.nz
Fri Oct 4 20:17:47 EDT 2002

It is possible that we complete OGR-24 -25 -26 -27 -28.... and actually 
find no new shorter rulers.

However i don't think that would be 'useless'  confirming through 
empirical work that the currently known shortest rules are in fact the 
shortest rulers is a worthwhile result.

The problem with OGR imho is that there is a vacum of information as to 
our progress.

Based on the rates from the first few months of OGR work, OGR-25 should 
have been finished a long time ago.  However a bug was discovered in the 
OGR client and AFAICT no one at dnet really understands the full impact 
of the bug, and so for the last two years we have been plodding along 
with no clear idea as to the usefullness of our work. (Dan Oetting made 
an insightful post about this many moons ago IIRC)

Surely there must be some OGR experts out there who would be interested 
enough in our results to help out in the project?

Steve Bennett wrote:

> Is this why people are complaining about not wanting to
>do OGR25?  Because it uses unused computer time to do something useless?

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list