[RC5] Removing Stats?

N. Parr nparr at usa.net
Fri Sep 27 08:24:23 EDT 2002


I agree that
"It was *not* created for people to have dick-size-wars over how many blocks
their machine(s) can crack"
but that is what encouraged a lot of people to become involved and therefore
I can understand those peoples disappointment.
Niles

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rc5 at lists.distributed.net
[mailto:owner-rc5 at lists.distributed.net]On Behalf Of Carl Inglis
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:52 AM
To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
Subject: Re: [RC5] Removing Stats?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 27 September 2002 8:49 am, Oliver Otte wrote:
> > yeah, you're the only one
>
> He isn't.
> Removing stats since 07/14 is cheating, nothing else than that.

Cheating? Who is getting cheated?

> The project did end yesterday, because the announcement was made that
> the key was found.

The goal of this project was to find the key. Therefore the projected
ended when its goal had been achieved and the key found. This was
14/07/2002. If the goal of the project had been to produce the stats,
then you might well be justified in feeling cheated.

> Some people did RC5 for fun or for stats, and d.net used those peoples'
> cycles, and doesn't want to give credit for that since 07/14 now. Now
> how sick is that?

It's not sick at all. Would you be whining if the key had been found 2
days ago and they were removing the last two days worth of stats?

You seem to be implying that DNet are doing something which will be to
their gain by trimming back the stats to the date the project actually
finished. What would that be then?

I did RC5 for fun, and because I thought it was a worthwhile project.
Whilst I accept that the cycles that my machines have done since
14/07/2002 are wasted, that's the nature of computing. Not everything
works as it is supposed to.

You appear to have lost track of the core reason this project was created.
It was created to use distributed computing to try a brute force approach
to cracking the RC5-64 encryption standard. It was *not* created for
people to have dick-size-wars over how many blocks their machine(s) can
crack.

Carl
- --
"..as to who I am now, if you're prompted to ask: I'm the ghost of my
future and the sum of my past."
	- Talis Kimberly, Small Mended Corners, Archetype Cafe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9lBwmisowi8wFwkkRAgjVAKDGryFOHEYKzTtTxIHtpxB4hAlYNgCfXZeH
/85Ejq9FRtdKUjsuyYZ7+d0=
=IykR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list