[RC5] Removing Stats?

Christopher Hicks chicks at chicks.net
Fri Sep 27 18:19:09 EDT 2002


On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Jason Hartzell wrote:
> That's great news.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Wilson [mailto:bwilson at distributed.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: RE: [RC5] Removing Stats?
> 
> 
> Hold on, folks.  We're talking about how we can show you stats including
> the period between 7/14 and 9/26.  I think it's going to happen, but I
> need some help from others who are also very busy.
> 
> Your point about things beyond your control is exactly the motivation
> behind putting stats back.  As someone else said, our policy has been to
> give full credit when work has been invalidated.  The fact that we knew
> before you did doesn't change the fact that you were all working very
> hard to turn around those blocks.  Likewise, you could make the case
> that only one block out of the whole project was "necessary".
> 
> We're still working out when, if and how we will bring back the stats in
> the gap, but you can be sure that we aren't going to just drop this
> without more serious discussion internally.

Thank you very much.  Good news indeed.

-- 
</chris>

Camels may be nasty beasts, but they're the only way to get through the
desert.

--
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest



More information about the rc5 mailing list