[RC5] Removing Stats?

Christopher Hicks chicks at chicks.net
Fri Sep 27 18:19:09 EDT 2002

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Jason Hartzell wrote:
> That's great news.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Wilson [mailto:bwilson at distributed.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Subject: RE: [RC5] Removing Stats?
> Hold on, folks.  We're talking about how we can show you stats including
> the period between 7/14 and 9/26.  I think it's going to happen, but I
> need some help from others who are also very busy.
> Your point about things beyond your control is exactly the motivation
> behind putting stats back.  As someone else said, our policy has been to
> give full credit when work has been invalidated.  The fact that we knew
> before you did doesn't change the fact that you were all working very
> hard to turn around those blocks.  Likewise, you could make the case
> that only one block out of the whole project was "necessary".
> We're still working out when, if and how we will bring back the stats in
> the gap, but you can be sure that we aren't going to just drop this
> without more serious discussion internally.

Thank you very much.  Good news indeed.


Camels may be nasty beasts, but they're the only way to get through the

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net
rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

More information about the rc5 mailing list