[RC5] OGR-24 100%
fuzzman at m-net.arbornet.org
Sun Aug 17 21:01:11 EDT 2003
Could it be that there is already a known shorter solution that would
preclude a total length over 70?
Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
Vir sapit qui pauca loquitur.
Cras amet qui numquam amavit, quique amavit cras plus amet.
Uno itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 distributed at banoffee.co.uk wrote:
> On 16 Aug, "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel at distributed.net> wrote:
> > The page is showing 100% due to rounding. As of last night, there were
> > 374 stubs that were still incomplete.
> What about the millions of stubs that have never been issued?
> Unless there is some other reason that I've never got a stub with a
> total length greater than 70, then there are vast chunks of the
> stubspace that have never been considered by the d.net project.
> Note when observing a stub being completed (in console mode) that the
> 6th and subsequent numbers reach values approaching or sometimes in
> excess of 100.
> To date, I've never seen such large number in the first 5 (issued) numbers
> in OGR-24 (or the first 6 in OGR-25).
> > As someone else mentioned, OGR-25 is what's next. }:8)
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to do the rest of OGR-24 first (all the valid
> stubs with a total length >= 71 ?
More information about the rc5