[RC5] geen post meer aub

ron prins prinsr at quicknet.nl
Sun Dec 14 11:07:46 EST 2003


wilt u mij geen post meer sturen ik vraag nergens om
vr gr ron prins


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rc5-request at lists.distributed.net>
To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: rc5 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 4


> Send rc5 mailing list submissions to
> rc5 at lists.distributed.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rc5-request at lists.distributed.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rc5-owner at lists.distributed.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of rc5 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. not long ago (Brad Tod)
>    2. AW: [RC5] new win clients vs Zoned Alarm (Kagain)
>    3. Re: rc5 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1 (Timothy Marsh)
>    4. Re: new win clients vs Zoned Alarm (SideWinder)
>    5. Still the 406 in statistics (and how to solve it !)
>       (Dennis Lubert)
>    6. Mersenne (Greg Lobring)
>    7. Re: Mersenne (Jim Reisert AD1C)
>    8. Participant stats not updated this morning (Daniel Quintiliani)
>    9. Re: Participant stats not updated this morning (Jim C. Nasby)
>   10. Re: Participant stats not updated this morning
>       (Daniel Quintiliani)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 23:29:45 -0500 (EST)
> From: Brad Tod <brad_tod at yahoo.ca>
> Subject: [RC5] not long ago
> To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <20031210042945.75010.qmail at web60408.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> somebody on here mentioned they got 64000 blocks done in 365 days. That
very close to my results after a year, 63500. If there like me they have two
average computers going 24/7.
>
>
>
> Later,
>
> Brad
>
> visit me on the web @ http://members.tripod.com/~Rambo_21
> http://www.facethejury.com/profile.asp?user_name=wiltshire
> AIM  wiltshire559   ICQ 5513138     MSN bradtod at rocketmail.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://lists.distributed.net/pipermail/rc5/attachments/20031209/9ff3f6f2/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:58:01 +0100
> From: "Kagain" <kagain at gmx.de>
> Subject: AW: [RC5] new win clients vs Zoned Alarm
> To: "'D.net Discussion'" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <001301c3bf2e$027a82d0$368406d5 at Horst>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I need to enter the data for you into bugzilla like a hole in my head...
>
>
> Ever considered using the same username/password for all 'unimportant'
> webpages like bugzilla?
>
>
> Horst
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: rc5-bounces at lists.distributed.net
> [mailto:rc5-bounces at lists.distributed.net] Im Auftrag von Mike Burgess
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2003 03:29
> An: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Betreff: [RC5] new win clients vs Zoned Alarm
>
> bugzilla - I need another username/email/password like a
> hole in my head.
>
> So here it is:
>
> New win client:
> dnetc v2.9007-486-GTR-03111106 for Win32 (Windows 4.10)
> dated Nov 23)
>  Crashes the last 2 versions of Zone Alarm {Free}
>   (it crashes the july and nov 2003 releases)
>
> Win98 SE  (all service packs and all IE6 updates
> installed.)
> AMD K7-4 (Athlon Thunderbird) processor
> Abit KT7A-Raid mobo  767MB RAM
>
> It's been running the last few years just fine, but the new
> release crashes ZA hard, and it usually leads to the
> wonderfull BSOD.
>
> Dnetc:
> dnetc v2.9007-486-GTR-03111106 for Win32 (Windows 4.10).
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] Automatic processor detection found 1
> processor.
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] Automatic processor type detection
> found an AMD K7-4 (Athlon Thunderbird) processor.
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (SS 2-pipe).
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] RC5-72: Loaded
> CA:70D062A3:00000000:1*2^32 (2.70% done)
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] RC5-72: 3 packets (3.00 stats units)
> remain in buff-in.r72
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] RC5-72: 1 packet (1.00 stats units)
> is in buff-out.r72
> [Dec 10 01:57:51 UTC] 1 cruncher has been started.
> [Dec 10 01:58:03 UTC] Attempting to resolve
> 'us23.v29.distributed.net'...
>     -- CRASHES AT THIS POINT --
>
> Error:  VSMON caused an invalid page fault in
> module KERNEL32.DLL at 018f:bff7a388.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =====
> "Welcome to the Darwinian Gene Pool Preserve.
>
> Go ahead and lean over the safety rail as far
> as you like and hand feed the carnivores."
>                     Non-Sequitor by Wiley
> _______________________________________________
> rc5 mailing list
> rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:39:01 -0500
> From: "Timothy Marsh" <Timothy.Marsh at usm.edu>
> Subject: [RC5] Re: rc5 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1
> To: <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <002001c3bf44$7fe0b4e0$82c5fea9 at halelamnet>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> > Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:41:11 -0500
> > From: aSe <aSe at SysFail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RC5] 0.060 completion of rc5-72
> > To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> >
> > At 02:06 PM 11/30/2003 +0800, you wrote:
> >
> > >On Saturday, Nov 29, 2003, at 19:24 Asia/Hong_Kong, Ñåðãåé wrote:
> > >
> > >>Okey, at current speed it would be nearly 1200 years to complete,
but...
> > >>
> > >>Moore's law
> > >>More than 25 years ago, when Intel was developing the first
> microprocessor,
> > >>company cofounder Gordon Moore predicted that the number of
transistors
> on a
> > >>microprocessor (and computing power) would double approximately every
18
> > >>months. To date, Moore's law has proven remarkably accurate.
> > >
> > >I'm not so sure about the 'number of transistors' bit though (25 years
is
> > >about 17 18-month periods, and if transistors on a chip is, say, 10
> > >million, that would mean under 100 transistors when Moore made such a
> > >prediction).
> > >
> > >I don't think you can do much with 100 transistors.
> >
> > A good link FYI..
> >
> > http://www.intel.com/research/silicon/mooreslaw.htm
> >
> > -aSe [aSe at SysFail.com]
>
>
> It's true that you can't do much with 100 transistors.  In fact, reading
the
> link above and the original paper, you find that there were onyl about 50
> components per square inch of chip.  That's why personal computers as we
> know them didn't really exist yet.  Moore's observation was made in 1965
and
> he predicted that it would hold true for about 10 years, and it did.  From
> 1975 on the law has been modified to 18 months (from 12) for doubling.
That
> adjusted law is what has held up till now.  Some say it is actually a
> self-fulfilling law since researchers use it as a goal.  Of course, the
law
> is based on the current type of technology, silicon based semi-conductor
> chips.  When we reach the limits of this technology, or we change
> technologies, then the rate of increase would probably be completely
> different (hopefully even faster).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:28:24 +0200
> From: SideWinder <sidewinder at kolumbus.fi>
> Subject: Re: [RC5] new win clients vs Zoned Alarm
> To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20031210202500.033eb100 at mail.kolumbus.fi>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> At 04:29 10.12.2003, you wrote:
> >So here it is:
> >
> >New win client:
> >dnetc v2.9007-486-GTR-03111106 for Win32 (Windows 4.10)
> >dated Nov 23)
> >  Crashes the last 2 versions of Zone Alarm {Free}
> >   (it crashes the july and nov 2003 releases)
> >
> >Win98 SE  (all service packs and all IE6 updates
> >installed.)
>
> Have you tried to manually add dnetc.exe to the Program Control as and
give
> it access rights in the Internet category? ZA recognises new versions
> (changes to components previously authorized) and with the default
settings
> it asks again whether to allow access.
>
> I'm running ZA Pro 4.5.530 in W2k Pro SP4 and I have no problems.
>
>
> --
>
>  >------->- SideWinder -<-------<
>
> PGP key ID: 0x77CCE3D6
>
> ...Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 170 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
http://lists.distributed.net/pipermail/rc5/attachments/20031210/6451b6ca/attachment-0001.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:19:24 +0100
> From: Dennis Lubert <plasmahh at gmx.net>
> Subject: [RC5] Still the 406 in statistics (and how to solve it !)
> To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20031211101031.028336a0 at pop.gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Hello People,
>
> there is still the annoying 406 Page when trying to view the statistics
page.
>
> I suppose the reason is quite easy to fix. Apache tries to negotiate with
> the browser which language to use. e.g. when going to www.distributed.net
> it chooses index.php.de for me, since my browser asks for german. When
> trying to load /statistics/ apache tries to find index.html.de but this is
> not there, only index.html.en. Therefore it refuses with a 406.
>
> More can be found on
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_negotiation.html at the
> ForceLanguagePriority descsription.
>
> So the best option would be to add a
>
> LanguagePriority en fr de
> ForceLanguagePriority Prefer
> ForceLanguagePriority Fallback
>
> to the servers config. This causes the server to choose the language with
> the highest priority if the browser accepts multiple languages (that are
> availbable as pages), or if no acceptable file is available, it displays
> the existing one with the highest priority.
>
> greets
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
> Carpe quod tibi datum est
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:41:10 -0500
> From: "Greg Lobring" <globring at hotmail.com>
> Subject: [RC5] Mersenne
> To: rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> Message-ID: <BAY8-F59moohBL3chpl00012e40 at hotmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
> Another success story for distributed computing:
>
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=562&e=3&u=/ap/biggest_prime_number
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Our best dial-up offer is back.  Get MSN Dial-up Internet Service for 6
> months @ $9.95/month now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:59:25 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
> Subject: Re: [RC5] Mersenne
> To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <20031211145925.93628.qmail at web13607.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> --- Greg Lobring <globring at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Another success story for distributed computing:
> >
> >
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=562&e=3&u=/ap/biggest_prime_number
>
> And anothere success story for accurate reporting.  How much memory is "2
> gigahertz"?
>
> - Jim
>
> "Michigan State University graduate student Michael Shafer stands next to
the
> computer in East Lansing, Mich., Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2003 he used to
discover
> the worlds highest prime number. Shafer ran a Dell Dimension PC with 2
> gigahertz of memory and an Intel Pentium 4 microprocessor _ 'like you'd
get at
> Circuit City' _ in his office for 19 days until Nov. 17, when he glanced
at the
> screen at 2:30 p.m. and saw 'New Mersenne prime found.' The number is
6,320,430
> digits long and would need 1,400 to 1,500 pages to write out. (AP
> Photo/Michigan State University, Greg L. Kohuth)"
>
>
> =====
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
> PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13  1193 B5D1 4FB6 79D1 70DC
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:20:19 -0500
> From: Daniel Quintiliani <coredump0 at mercurylink.net>
> Subject: [RC5] Participant stats not updated this morning
> To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <oprz26v5y5xdjnyh at smtp.mercurylink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> The participant stats were not updated this morning.
>
> -- 
> -Dan
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:40:58 -0600
> From: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel at distributed.net>
> Subject: Re: [RC5] Participant stats not updated this morning
> To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <20031212214058.GZ847 at distributed.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> They appear to be up-to-date to me... what URL are you looking at?
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:20:19PM -0500, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > The participant stats were not updated this morning.
> >
> > -- 
> > -Dan
> > _______________________________________________
> > rc5 mailing list
> > rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> > http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
> >
>
> -- 
> Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant                  jim at nasby.net
> Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
> Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
>
> Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
> Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
> FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:48:32 -0500
> From: Daniel Quintiliani <coredump0 at mercurylink.net>
> Subject: Re: [RC5] Participant stats not updated this morning
> To: "D.net Discussion" <rc5 at lists.distributed.net>
> Message-ID: <oprz2766bixdjnyh at smtp.mercurylink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:40:58 -0600, Jim C. Nasby <decibel at distributed.net>
> wrote:
>
> > They appear to be up-to-date to me... what URL are you looking at?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:20:19PM -0500, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >> The participant stats were not updated this morning.
> >>
>
> The main stats are fine but the individual pages are not.
>
> Here's mine:
>
http://stats.distributed.net/participant/psummary.php?project_id=8&id=424336
> Here's someone else's:
>
http://stats.distributed.net/participant/psummary.php?project_id=8&id=404290
>
> -- 
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rc5 mailing list
> rc5 at lists.distributed.net
> http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
>
>
> End of rc5 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 4
> *********************************



More information about the rc5 mailing list