[stats-dev] Status of PGSQL

Chris Hodson nerf at slacker.com
Tue Mar 25 15:56:11 EST 2003

Well, the variable names require a space after them, for one thing.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stats-dev at lists.distributed.net
[mailto:owner-stats-dev at lists.distributed.net] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:41 PM
To: stats-dev at lists.distributed.net
Subject: Re: [stats-dev] Status of PGSQL

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:38:54PM +0000, Chris Hodson wrote:
> Note that psql does support variables, but in my opinion it looks 
> kludgy. Joel had converted the ogr database to use this at one point 
> and we ripped it all out (sorry about that Joel).
> Unless we're in some sort of rush, we might as well do it the right 
> way. Besides, that will make it that much easier when we go to the 
> next RDBMS.

Figured out the variables today. What problem do you see with them? Seems
like a perfectly fine approach to take for now. I decided against the stored
procs because logging would be impossible, but in the future a syslog
function should handle that issue.

Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!)                    jim at nasby.net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe stats-dev' to
majordomo at lists.distributed.net

To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe stats-dev' to majordomo at lists.distributed.net

More information about the stats-dev mailing list